I'm having a very good discussion on Twitter right now, and it's about hushfilm.com WIRED has branded the speakers as False Witnesses. Given a history of them all.

https://rewire.news/false-witnesses/#angela-e-lanfranchi

1. Angela LaFranchini

I don't see that they found any prolife (or anti-choice, to use their phrase) bias, unless stating her medical opinions and findings is a bias. She doesn't belong to any prolife group.
So what if she was paid for 'Services Rendered' to the NJ AG office. Doctors get paid!

2.Dr. James Anderson
Again, no bias, just a wish to see abortion providers keep a high standard. The standard of care provided in many abortion clinics is deplorable. See www.clinicquotes.com

3.Dr. Joel Brind
The 2003 Conference stank to high heaven with what I saw of it, and the NCI are very afraid to revisit the subject. What have they got to be scared of if they are correct? They should do another study with correct demographic subjects and publish the results. 2003 is a long time ago in Cancer Research.